AOPA abandons 85,000 followers on X

by philg

Here’s something bizarre:

AOPA is the lobbying group for general aviation, especially piston peasants (the Gulfstreamers have NBAA). Their membership is down by about half over the past 20 years, which eviscerates their lobbying power. As the U.S. population booms via low-skill immigration (Pew), members of Congress don’t want to bother with orgs that don’t have at least 400,000 members. Why would AOPA walk away from 85,000+ followers? My comment:

LinkedIn? Isn’t someone rich enough to own an aircraft supposed to be rich enough not to have to check LinkedIn regularly? TikTok? Are you sure that AOPA HQ staff have actually met a GA pilot? Did you hire some tween girls to run AOPA social media? Or maybe I missed the Garmin avionics partnership with Taylor Swift.

TikTok shows that they have only about 38,000 followers there. Similarly, they have fewer followers on LinkedIn than they do on X (about 61,000). I guess because GA pilots are so old, they do have over 200,000 followers on Facebook. But how tough is it to post at least the bigger stories on X simultaneously with the other social media systems? Presumably it can be done automatically, even without AI.

AOPA is important because, without them, any airport too small for a Pilatus PC-24 would be closed and turned into public housing for immigrants. Also, any aircraft smaller than a Phenom 300 would be excluded from ATC services so as to ensure plenty of capacity for the elite and the airlines.

Maybe California billionaires will step in and save AOPA. Democrat thought-leader Ro Khanna says they’ll be just as rich after a 5% haircut, which of course means that they can get another 5% haircut immediately afterwards and still be just as rich, which of course sets them up for Haircut #3… By the time the wise mandarins of Sacramento are finished, California’s Falcon 8X owners will be cut back to SR22-G2 fractional and, therefore, ready to join and support AOPA.

Can someone explain this? NPR sanctimoniously departed X during the Biden administration, but they had an endless river of taxpayer money to tap into and their loyal readers presumably got a lot of joy when they heard about Elon Musk being starved of traffic and ad revenue. But the typical AOPA member isn’t a progressive Democrat aligned with AOC and Bernie Sanders. How does AOPA benefit by leaving EAA, which already has twice as many members, as the dominant GA voice on X?

In the case the original tweet is memory-holed:

Update: AOPA reversed its decision. They said that they pulled back from X because engagement had fallen. But maybe their engagement has fallen because their X posts are lame? Here’s one that has no photo. It’s just a link to a page somewhere other than X:

Is it worth the click? Maybe, but the DC-6 doesn’t have anything to do with AOPA. Very few social media users follow links. They react to what they see in front of them. Compare to this WSJ post. Most people can get what they need to know out of it without following the link.

It’s trivial to ask Grok why AOPA has been such a failure recently on X. Excerpts from Grok’s full explanation:

They post like it is still 2015. Almost every item is a magazine lede plus an aopa.org URL. On the current X ranking, an off-platform link with no image is close to invisible. A post that says “click to leave this site” does not get likes, and likes are what get the next batch of impressions. The DC-6 post is the clean example: a crowd-pleasing airplane, no picture of the airplane.

They are not in the conversation. Aviation on X is replies, quote-posts, accident threads, MOSAIC and medical fights, airport threats, and people with airplanes in the photo. AOPA does not show up on breaking general-aviation news, does not answer members, and does not quote the FAA or a member of Congress. An account that does not reply gets treated as a brochure. They also went dark for more than two months, which is enough for the ranking system to stop showing an account to its own followers.

The topics are aimed at a different feed. A large share of the summer posts were event recaps, scholarship notes, “women in aviation” features, and high-school curriculum. Those can do fine on Instagram. On X, the pilots who actually reply want regulatory substance, airplane pictures, and a named human. EAA, the same day AOPA was walking back its exit, posted a C-5 photo and a taco joke and already had more likes than most of AOPA’s July posts ever reached.

The 80% drop is real and mostly self-inflicted. X did change the rules: links are down-ranked, replies and native video are up-ranked, Premium accounts get more distribution, and dormant accounts fall out of followers’ feeds. AOPA says it tried several formats. The samples that are still up are still link dumps, occasional TikTok-shaped video, and no conversation. Other platforms growing does not mean X emptied out. The exit post proved the opposite: when they wrote something people wanted to answer, the same 85,000-follower account reached 706,000 views.

They also do not appear to be paying for a checkmark. For an association this size that is a small, fixable distribution penalty, not the main problem.

Full post, including comments

Life with X Money (do you get wiped out when the world wakes up to Starship being a total failure?)

by philg

At the risk of being tarred with the “Elon Fanboy” brush, I’ve moved some cash into X Money, thus bumping the yield from 3.75% (a UBS money market) to the nice round number of 6% (for those who either make regular deposits (e.g., payroll direct deposit) or who sign up to X’s premium offering, which I did to get the Edit button (never fully delivered, incidentally; it works for original posts, but not for replies)).

Scientific American interviewed experts and learned that Starship, financially glommed together with X money, will never reach orbit as a practical vehicle. The world’s smartest and most productive people live in New York City and they also figured out that Starship can’t work. New York magazine (“Intelligence” is literally part of the name, which tells you how much more intelligent these journalists are than the readers outside of NYC):

Starship is “destined for the scrap heap” according to one of the brightest engineering minds in the Islamic Republic of the UK:

What happens when #Science catches up to Elon and SpaceX? Will they run off with this money to cover their losses from Starship? Not so fast. The money lives at one or more FDIC-insured conventional banks. (If you invest more than $250,000, which is still the limit for deposits despite the raging inflation that the government says we haven’t experienced, X Money spreads the money automatically across multiple banks. The $250k limit was established temporarily during the Collapse of 2008 and then Milton Friedman (“Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program.”) was proven correct in July 2010.)

It took only a few minutes to transfer some funds from Bank of America via the Plaid service that X Money uses to connect bank accounts. It’s a little unnerving that Plaid asks for permission to see one’s monthly statements, but I assume that everyone in China and Russia has already read these so I agreed.

There has been a political and media campaign to discredit X Money by pointing out that the main bank underlying the service, Cross River Bank, was hassled by the Federales. Example:

[Native American Elizabeth] Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, wants to know exactly when Musk plans to offer the digital tool, what banking services it will provide and whether it will issue a stablecoin. She also pushed him to divulge whether he plans to work with the fintech Cross River Bank in offering the X Money services, which she noted was the subject of a Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. enforcement action in 2023 for “unsafe and unsound practices related to fair lending.”

“Unsafe and unsound” is unnerving, to say the least! Did Cross River Bank lend to people who are less creditworthy than Bank of America, for example? ChatGPT says that the FDIC went after Cross River Bank because of the potential for the opposite behavior, i.e., restricting borrowing to those whom studies have shown are less likely to default.

The 2023 case is the one producing most of the scary current headlines about “unsafe or unsound banking practices.” It arose from a 2021 FDIC examination and concerned Cross River’s large business of originating loans through fintech partners. The FDIC said Cross River had inadequate internal controls, information systems and credit-underwriting practices for monitoring compliance with fair-lending laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Truth in Lending Act. Cross River consented to the order without admitting or denying the allegations.

But there’s an important distinction: the public 2023 order does not say that Cross River was undercapitalized, short of liquidity, mishandling deposits, or likely to fail. Nor did that order impose a monetary penalty. The concern was that Cross River’s controls weren’t adequate to demonstrate that the enormous volume of lending done through outside fintech companies was complying with fair-lending and consumer-credit rules. The order actually required Cross River to investigate whether particular lending disparities amounted to discriminatory practices and whether remediation was warranted, rather than publicly declaring that a particular class of borrowers had already been proven to have been discriminated against.

Prompt: “What would happen if a bank doesn’t comply with fair lending? Who wouldn’t get a loan?”

In the simplest case, someone who is otherwise similarly qualified could be denied a loan—or charged more—because of a legally protected characteristic rather than because of credit risk. Under the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the protected characteristics include race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, receipt of public-assistance income, and exercising certain consumer-credit rights. Lenders can still use ordinary underwriting variables such as income, debt, credit history and collateral.

Would a bank have any rational basis for trying not to lend to the Somalis who built Boston and Minneapolis, for example?

In U.S. mortgage data, white borrowers have historically had lower delinquency/default rates than Black borrowers on average. For example, a Federal Reserve analysis of conventional first-lien home-purchase mortgages originated in 2006 found that 24.8% of Black borrowers versus 6.4% of non-Hispanic white borrowers became 60+ days delinquent within two years. Even within credit-score bands, Black borrowers had higher delinquency rates in that particular cohort; after adjusting for HMDA variables and Equifax risk score, the Black–white gap was still about 8 percentage points.

On the broader principle, though: if a prohibited characteristic such as race carries residual predictive information about default even after all the lender’s permitted variables are considered, then fair-lending law does constrain a lender from using every statistically predictive variable available. Regulation B currently says a creditor may not discriminate on a prohibited basis in any aspect of a credit transaction, including the criteria used to evaluate creditworthiness. … What they cannot do is add something like “Black borrower: +40 basis points” even if historical data showed that race improved default prediction at the margin. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

A U.S. study using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics found that immigrants who had been in the U.S. for 10–20 years had higher mortgage-delinquency rates than otherwise similar native-born households after controlling for observed characteristics

So the headline “risk” identified by Elizabeth Warren and others was actually that Cross River Bank might not be lending enough money to people who are more likely to default. This is “unsafe and unsound”, just like it would be “unsafe and unsound” for an individual to refuse to lend to an unemployed relative.

X Money offers a debit card that sounds like it takes all of the fees that merchants pay, and some additional, and hands it back to you.

What’s an example of “up to 3%”? 0% is the fine print example, apparently. Gemini:

Peer-to-peer transfers, wire transfers, and betting/gambling. In updated terms, standard high-cost categories like utilities, wholesale clubs (such as Costco), rent/tax payments, jewelry, and university tuition have been nerfed and no longer qualify for the 3% return. On these purchases, you will earn 0%.

Complete list at https://money.x.com/en/i/cashback-rewards-terms

Another reason to be less excited about a debit card, I think, is that consumer protections are weaker, e.g., if you’re overcharged by a merchant or a merchant sells you something that is defective and won’t take it back.

I can’t keep track of the plastic cards that I already have, so I’m saying “no” so far to the debit card. I moved funds into the 6% account on September 21, 2026 and X Money shows that it is still there despite the failed launch of 52 tons of Starlink V3 satellites into orbit by Starship on September 28.

Loosely related… (SpaceX and money)

Full post, including comments

Grok and ChatGPT inhabit parallel universes when asked about justice for the Cornell Victim

by philg

A low-income woman is about 5X more likely to suffer sexual assault than someone from a family that sends children to Ivy League colleges. ChatGPT:

Pooling 2017–2022, the annual rape/sexual-assault victimization rate for people living in households earning under $25,000 was 3.8 per 1,000. For households earning $100,000–$199,999, it was 0.9 per 1,000, and for households earning $200,000 or more, 0.8 per 1,000. In other words, the lowest-income group had roughly 4–5 times the annual rate of the highest-income groups. Those figures are for persons age 12+, not women alone, but women constitute the large majority of rape/sexual-assault victims…. The women statistically at greatest risk are disproportionately low-income women, not women at elite universities.

The passion for what happens at elite colleges is explained by a University of California professor in Why America’s professional elite are so interested in sex acts at universities. What about the fact that New York’s governor and attorney general are now going after the fraternity brothers accused in Lucy Craig’s civil lawsuit seeking “compensatory and punitive damages”? (given the deep pockets of the defendants, e.g., Cornell University, and the punitive damages angle might she end up becoming the first billionaire rape victim?)

Using the conventional terminology of our greatest contemporary poets, e.g., Kanye West, I asked AI the following question:

If a hood rat girl said she was raped would the governor and attorney general be involved?

Grok:

No. A routine report from a poor woman in Ithaca or the Bronx would not get the governor and the attorney general.

ChatGPT:

Possibly, but there’s no solid basis to say that the governor and attorney general would not have intervened if the complainant were a poor or socially marginalized woman.

(Certainly the men will be getting a fair trial by a jury of 12 who are all wearing #IAmJaneDoe T-shirts. Maybe the defense attorneys will be searching desperately for a Haitian immigrant?)

Here’s a reminder that whatever the Cornell students were up to in 2024, it was all financed by taxes extracted from the working class:

The heavy partying at ultra-expensive institutions like Cornell is being financed by untold billions of non-market government-backed loans that let students take what amounts to a four-year cruise – parties, sports, even occasional lectures. I would guess none of the participants were electrical engineering majors.

Most adults don’t have all-night ketamine bacchanals because they have to work in the morning. But 18-21 year olds are given all the privileges of adulthood without and of the responsibility. Don’t treat them like Roman aristocrats and then wonder at their decadence.

Regarding the likely majors of the participants, from Missoula: Rape and the Justice System in a College Town (a.k.a. majoring in partying and football) (2015):

Nobody is raped in the physics lab in Missoula if for no other reason than nobody Krakauer followed took a physics course to begin with

Now that there is a person definitively associated with the incident (Lucy Craig’s name was apparently made public by incompetence within the New York State court system), I wonder if there will be any Deplorables dressing up like her for Halloween. If so, what would the costume look like? If commercially marketed, would it be labeled “Cornell Student”, “Jane Hoe”, “#IAmJaneDoe”? (I don’t think that Lucy Craig’s name or precise likeness from social media could be used for commercial/advertising purposes without her permission.)

From the above, mentioned Krakauer book, on the profits to be made via civil lawsuits enabled by a rape allegation:

In 2002, [Brian] Banks was a junior at Polytechnic High School in Long Beach, California, a six-foot-four, 225-pound linebacker on an extraordinary football team. … Banks was aggressively recruited by some of the nation’s top college football programs and accepted a scholarship offer from the University of Southern California. … While attending summer classes before his senior year at Long Beach Poly, Banks had a chance encounter with a sophomore named Wanetta Gibson that, according to Banks, culminated in consensual sex. According to Gibson, Banks raped her. In a note Gibson wrote to a friend, which became a crucial piece of evidence, she said Banks “picked me up and put me in the elevator and he took me down stairs and he pulled my pants down and he rapped [sic] me and he didn’t have a condom on and I was a virgin and now Im [sic] not.” When interviewed by the police, Wanetta Gibson told a more detailed version of the same story, and Brian Banks, who was seventeen years old, was charged with forcible rape. Were he convicted, he could be sentenced to life in prison. Like thousands of other defendants ensnared in the criminal justice system, … Banks agreed to plead no contest to the rape charge, spend at least five years in prison, remain on probation for an additional five years, and register as a sex offender. While Brian Banks was serving his time, Wanetta Gibson and her mother filed a lawsuit against the Long Beach Unified School District, claiming that lax security at Poly High School created an unsafe environment that led to her being raped. The suit was settled out of court, with the school district agreeing to pay Gibson $1.5 million.

… her conscience began to bother her. In March 2011, a few years after Brian Banks was released from prison, he logged onto Facebook and saw he’d received a friend request from Wanetta Gibson, his accuser. … Banks asked if she would meet with him in the presence of a private investigator, Freddie Parish, whose son had been a teammate of his at Poly. Gibson agreed, and during their meeting she admitted what Banks knew to be the truth all along: He had not raped her. Unbeknownst to Wanetta Gibson, Parish was secretly recording the conversation. … Brian Banks’s conviction was reversed in May 2012. Thirteen months later, the Long Beach Unified School District won a $2.6 million default judgment against Wanetta Gibson to recoup the settlement she had received, plus interest and damages.

Here’s Banks, who enabled Wanetta Gibson to “make bank”:

Who wants to bet that Wanetta Gibson put the $1.5 million she received into an S&P 500 index fund and that, therefore, California taxpayers/the school district were able to recover their money plus interest? Separately, if we assume that Ms. Gibson was represented by an attorney who took a fact percentage of the $1.5 million via a contingency fee, why wouldn’t the school district try to recover some of the taxpayers’ money from the attorney?

Finally, here’s New York Republican Mike Lawler, chairman of the House Middle East and North Africa Subcommittee, telling Muslim-Americans “Any of our daughters could be Jane Doe”. Isn’t that rather insulting? How many immigrants from Somalia or Afghanistan believe that their daughters would be voluntarily consuming 10+ drinks containing alcohol and then going, without a male relative escort and without a burqa or even hijab, to a fraternity party hosted by non-Muslims?

Part of the Plaintiff’s own account of her voluntary actions, tough to square with the Quran and the Hadiths:

Full post, including comments

Larry Ellison: 82 years old with five children who need tutors

by philg

Despite my love for all things Oracle, somehow I missed that Larry Ellison, now 82 years old, has five children under 18.

“The Gated Community Where Larry Ellison Bought Eight Homes for His Staff” (Wall Street Journal, 9/28/2026):

The Ellisons have kept details about their five children, who are younger than 18, private. They are involved parents, according to people familiar with the interactions. The Manalapan home has several buildings that include areas where the older children are home-schooled. There are an array of tutors, and the children are learning several languages, the people said.

I hope for the kids’ sake that Larry is on one of those Silicon Valley life extension plans!

Unintentionally funny:

“Every single home has a view of the water,” local agent Ashley McCoy of Serhant said of Palm Meadows Estates.

Any development engineered out of the Everglades, like the one where Larry chose to park the staff, must have ponds and canals to hold rainwater and prevent flooding. Developers present these water features to newcomers as some sort of amenity that could have been more houses if they’d been greedier, but the reality is always that a neighborhood has the minimum pond acreage deemed necessary by the hydrological engineers (whose skill level is amazing, incidentally! Our development (Abacoa) has supposedly never flooded in 25+ years, despite catching the edges of a few hurricanes; the Science wasn’t as advanced in the 1960s and 1970s, I think, and Florida adopted some new rules about the miracle of land creation in the 1970s (source)). Also, the typical pond has a noisy fountain in the middle that runs all day to interfere with algae and mosquito production.

Related:

  • “Larry Ellison adds Lion Country to PBC purchases including Eau Palm Beach” (Palm Beach Post, 2025): “After almost 60 years, the family that founded Lion Country Safari, Florida’s largest drive-through safari, has sold its 600-acre Loxahatchee land holdings for $30 million to the family of Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, reportedly the third-richest man in the world. … Technology magnate Ellison also has bought multiple other properties in Palm Beach County, including a Manalapan mega mansion, a waterfront estate in North Palm Beach and the Eau Palm Beach Resort & Spa that he purchased in 2024 for $277.4 million.”
Full post, including comments

Artificial Intelligence for Bonsai care (ChatGPT, Bonsai Master)

by philg

Can ChatGPT prune a bonsai? Our backyard plant:

Initial advice:

Yes, a light pruning would help. The narrow-leaved tree looks like a podocarpus, and its tall shoot on the left has grown well beyond the rest of the canopy.

I’d start by cutting that tall shoot back to a leafy side branch around the height of the middle foliage. Then shorten a few other long tips to bring the outline together, and remove the clearly dead twigs near the trunk. Keep some green foliage beyond each cut; avoid cutting the live branches back to bare wood. Podocarpus can be pruned during active growth.

The broad-leaved shoots at the base look like a different plant. Trace them to the soil before pulling them: if they have separate stems, remove them so they don’t compete with the bonsai. I’d do those few cuts first and reassess its shape before pruning more.

I removed the weed (“undocumented enriching immigrant plant”) and asked ChatGPT to annotate an updated photo:

The pruned-by-an-11-year-old version:

ChatGPT:

That cut looks clean, and the tree’s height is much closer to the rest of its canopy. I’d stop pruning live branches for now and let it grow. The two thin shoots still reaching up on the left can be shortened later if you want a tighter outline. For now, I’d only remove twigs you’ve confirmed are dead.

Might we be about to enter a golden age of Japanese gardens and bonsai? The problem with these disciplines is that they require intelligence that Americans lack (average IQ in Japan is substantially higher than in the U.S.), diligence and attention to detail that Americans lack, and labor that Americans can’t afford. What if AI supplies the intelligence and Optimus supplies the labor? Why not have a yard that looks like Kenroku-en, Koraku-en, or Kairaku-en? Why wouldn’t a Floridian have a tropical bonsai collection that competes with the one at Heathcote in Fort Pierce? (Not exclusively Japanese, but why not also have an orchid garden comparable to the one in Naples? Need to mist them every day? Not a problem for Optimus. (the Japanese are great at everything, of course, and have a rich orchid tradition as well))

Full post, including comments

Why America’s professional elite are so interested in sex acts at universities

by philg

A search for “cornell nytimes.com” yields a full page of results related to students having purportedly engaged in various sex acts on campus back in 2024:

Nothing newsworthy other than one night of sex has occurred at an Ivy League institution with 26,500 students and more than 3,000 faculty members. How is that possible? Catherine Liu, a professor at UC Irvine, explains in Virtue Hoarders:

For as long as most of us can remember, the professional managerial class (PMC) has been fighting a class war, not against capitalists or capitalism, but against the working classes.

The culture war was always a proxy economic war, but the 1960s divided the country into the allegedly enlightened and the allegedly benighted, with the PMC able to separate itself from its economic inferiors in a way that seemed morally justifiable. It was after 1968 that the PMC gradually shifted its allegiance from workers to capital. Since that time, the most successful and visible segments of the PMC have brazenly put their smarts at the service of the bosses.

As a class, the PMC loves to talk about bias rather than inequality, racism rather than capitalism, visibility rather than exploitation. Tolerance for them is the highest secular virtue—but tolerance has almost no political or economic meaning.

How can the elites in the PMC serve their capitalist overlords? Distract people from serious attempts to confiscate and transfer wealth from the most successful capitalists, e.g., the billionaires who can’t buy Bernie, to the deserving working class. What’s a good distraction? College students having sex.

Under the Obama administration, the state became intensely involved in the enlightened regulation of sex. From 2008, PMC triumphalism under the well-spoken and well-read president channeled the collective energy of liberals to focus on sex in one of the most important sites of class formation: university campuses, especially elite university campuses. Instrumentalized obsession with sexual violence and sexual excess is an important part of American Puritanism: moral and virtuous superiority in the sexual enlightenment makes up an important part of the countercultural inheritance of the PMC. Rather than focusing on economic malfeasance, an ascendant PMC elite under Obama pursued sexual crimes—not at work or in the workplace but on college campuses—with a zeal that liberals reserve for any policy that diverts attention away from economic redistribution. In short, rather than break up the banks or reform the financial sector after he took office, Obama wanted to use his electoral victory to eliminate sexual violence on college campuses. In 2011, his Department of Education Office for Civil Rights sent a “Dear Colleague” letter to more than seven thousand universities warning them that if they did not take action to prevent and remedy sexual violence and sexual assault on their campuses, they would risk losing their rights to all federal funding.

At the same time, sensational stories of sexual violence and sexual abuse on college campuses emerged in the mainstream media, as if to confirm the necessity of the Obama administration’s stringent new policies. In 2015, at the height of the Obama-era sex panic, Kirby Dick’s The Hunting Ground was released by—wait for it—the Weinstein Company. Dick’s documentary presented college campuses as terrifying places for young women to live. Dick, with the help of Harvey Weinstein, pandered to his liberal audience’s thirst for stories about campus sexual violence. In 2016, Amber Frost cited the National Crime Victimization Survey numbers showing that non-college-going women were 1.2 times more likely to be sexually assaulted than their college-going counterparts. Sexual violence on college campuses attracted liberal PMC elites to a new front in the culture wars, far away from inequality, oppression, and workplace sexual harassment and discrimination. Fighting sexual violence on campus allowed the PMC to reinforce its belief that white-collar professionals and lawyers like Atticus Finch were the true heroes in low-risk struggles against anything but economic abuse.

Fifty years after the Summer of Love, college-going women were armed with more information and more sex education than any generation before them, but they seemed less capable of assuming sexual agency and more in need of protection than previous generations of women, who had had to deal with sexual autonomy and male desire without the help of university Title IX officers.

The bankers whose “tails I win; heads you/taxpayers/shareholders lose” risk-taking caused the Collapse of 2008 skated free/rich while Black college athletes and fraternity meatheads were pursued (see Missoula: Rape and the Justice System in a College Town (a.k.a. majoring in partying and football) and “A Rape on Campus”).

Please don’t take this post as an opinion regarding what kind of sex occurred at Cornell, who was at fault, if anyone, etc. I haven’t followed the case beyond the headlines (though with the Governor of New York State hunting for the fraternity guys with a special prosecutor, I assume that the guys will be found guilty and imprisoned). My personal opinion is that as the U.S. welcomes more Muslim immigrants, the kind of situation that gave rise (so to speak) to the situation will disappear. Women will once again be a defined category and they won’t be permitted to gather with unrelated men, consume alcohol, etc. No woman will be able to file a civil lawsuit seeking monetary damages after being raped in a fraternity house because, without a male relative escort, no woman will be able to enter a fraternity house at any time of the day or night.

The complaint does have one interesting angle. The plaintiff says that she was 20 years old at the time the events occured and also that “Plaintiff was in [her sorority’s] care, custody, and control” (essentially, that she was a child or maybe a slave to the sorority).

Though eligible to vote, she characterizes herself as a “minor” (if 20-year-old students are, in fact, minors, should they have the right to vote laws into place?): “Plaintiff, as a minor under 21 years old,”.

One more interesting tidbit from the book is an explanation for the popularity and acceptance of intellectually fraudulent activities such as the New York Times’s 1619 Project (primarily organized by Nikole Hannah-Jones, who has been in the news recently).

The authors of the Project reject all criticism of it: they believe that their findings do not depend on the research consensus and archival evidence sorted through by a scholarly community of historians. Using her new clout and massive audience, Nikole Hannah-Jones led the way in dismissing the accepted scholarship that had been done on colonial America as simply the highly biased work of white males. Lifetimes of careful, empirical research were simply no match for massive foundation dollars backed by one of the largest media companies in the world. It is clear that powerful financial and media interests are behind the promotion of the 1619 Project and its bold attempt to change the way we understand American history and historical research itself. The Project is on top of everything, a bold attempt to eliminate historical materialism from the teaching and writing of American history while destroying the possibility of solidarity in the American working class.

Liberals have abandoned history, because they have to believe they are superior to elites of the past and the contemporary working class at the same time.

Full post, including comments

FlyDubai 1073 proves how useless college graduates are

by philg

The story now seems to be that it was an Israeli plumber who pulled the first officer out of the Flydubai 1073 cockpit and then recovered the Boeing 737 Max from an unusual attitude (nose-down). All of Yaniv Hayoun’s flight training was from watching a TV show, Mayday: Air Disaster (your blog host is interviewed in Season 20, Episode 5 (“Atlantic Ditching”) of this show on Peacock, but unfortunately everything intelligent that I said regarding the Sikorsky S-92 avionics design was cut).

The Sun:

He then called his friends for help, putting the assailant in a chokehold before dragging him out from the cockpit and grabbing the controls in an incredible show of bravery.

When the plane began to level as he gripped the controls, an off-duty pilot told Yaniv that he would take it from there.

Since you can’t spit in the street without hitting a college graduate, including in Israel, it seems safe to surmise that this flight was packed with college grads. Could we ask for better proof about the uselessness-in-practice of college graduates? Whatever thinking they might do can now be done better by LLMs. When action is called for, it is the tradesman who acts.

Separately, now that I realize how easy it is for Pilot A to stab Pilot B, I am now surprised that none of the Delta/Comair captains ever stabbed me. It’s a straightforward way to deal with a lot of first officer issues.

Related:

Full post, including comments

Swissflation

by philg

money illusion: In economics, money illusion, or price illusion, is a cognitive bias where money is thought of in nominal, rather than real terms.

A tale to warm the hearts of those who are celebrating National Economic Education Month (a web site from the experts at controlling inflation)….

As a 165 lb. 6′-tall teenager in 1978, I could afford to indulge in a Lindt chocolate bar every day or two. These were 99 cents at a drug store that was on my way home from work at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and school at George Washington University. I think they might have been 125g. CVS back in April was selling 150g bars for $8.49. That’s an inflation rate per gram of about 615%, which seems staggering but can be accomplished by compounding 4.3% per year for 47 years.

(note that the size also had to inflate, along with average American BMI, from 125g to 150g!)

Note that October is also Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer/Questioning (LGBTQ) History Month. According to Wikipedia, there’s a Florida angle to this observance: “In 2012, for the first time, two American school districts celebrated LGBTQ History Month. The Broward County school district in Florida signed a resolution in September in support of LGBTQ Americans, and later that year the Los Angeles school district, America’s second-largest, also signed on.”

Full post, including comments

The climate and hurricane doomers of Carnegie-Mellon move to Miami

by philg

For twenty years, Carnegie-Mellon University has been dishing out fat helpings of climate and hurricane doom.

What’s the most obvious place to set up a new campus for 3,500 students and keep them safe from ever-more-intense hurricanes and relentless sea level rise? How about Miami, Florida?

The press release says that the new campus will be about 6 inches above best-case predicted sea level in Wynwood:

The new campus, to be built in Miami’s dynamic Wynwood neighborhood, is ultimately planned to support more than 3,500 undergraduate, master’s and Ph.D. students, nearly 300 faculty, and over 600 staff members, pending appropriate regulatory approvals. The first students are set to enroll in 2028, marking a bold step forward for the university and its ambitions.

Carnegie-Mellon is home to Nobel-winning Climate Doomer Ed Rubin:

Emeritus Professor Ed Rubin was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, when U.S. Vice President Al Gore shared the prize with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, for which Rubin was coordinating lead author of the Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. The awardees were recognized for their “efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change.” Rubin is the first CMU faculty member to share in a Nobel Peace Prize.

Rubin, who helped establish the Engineering and Public Policy program at CMU, is the the most highly cited authority on carbon capture and storage systems and is an internationally recognized expert in energy and environmental technology innovation and climate change mitigation.

“Decarbonization: Climate change is personal now” (cmu.edu 2023):

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says carbon capture deployment is lagging if we want to meet global mitigation targets. With the stakes so high, why is this the case?

“We’re now seeing the linkages between climate change and other phenomena like forest fires, droughts, heat waves, and floods. If your house burns down in a forest fire, that gets your attention. If your house floods because of a hurricane, that gets your attention. When science links those tragedies to climate change induced by human activities, then the realization kicks in, ‘Hey this isn’t something far in the future that doesn’t affect me or my family.’ It’s getting personal now,” says Rubin.

CMU faculty won’t sit out hurricanes in Pittsburgh anymore, in other words, but will voluntarily make hurricanes part of their lived experience.

cmu.edu, 2007:

“Adaptation planning is becoming critical as communities, states and countries begin to address rising sea-levels and other challenges of a changing global climate.”

Formerly a military officer, Perkins is now one of 1,000 volunteers in the United States selected and trained by Former Vice President Al Gore and the non-profit group The Climate Project to spread the message of global warming and the urgent moral responsibility to take action.

After 19 additional years of taxpayer-funded Science, the “urgent moral responsibility” and best adaptation turned out to be moving from Pittsburgh to Miami and grabbing Ken Griffin’s money with both hands.

In 2008, cmu.edu warned us that “the climate crisis isn’t going away”.

Here’s one of CMU’s top professors in this area, Costa Samaras. Right in the middle of coronapanic (July 2020) he reminded everyone to continue to panic regarding sea level rise:

The same CMU professor said that Florida would be cooked by 2030, just two years after the new CMU campus opens.

This links to a NYT article on which the professor is a co-author:

Rising average temperatures make extreme heat more likely, hurricanes and storms more intense and threaten fresh water supplies. Climate impacts have already started to hit.

Where better to move than Miami if you’re afraid of more intense hurricanes and storms? There is so much in this guy’s feed that I can’t resist one more:

Let’s close out this post with a big thank-you to the lockdown Democrats of Chicago, Illinois, New York City, and New York State. Without their tireless efforts to degrade the quality of life in Chicago and NYC, there is no way that Ken Griffin would have brought himself and his $55+ billion to Florida!

Related, the land that CMU said would soon be underwater was worth $1.1 billion:

See also Preparing for the Age of AI with Prof. Uju Anya at Carnegie-Mellon at $93,614 per year and imagine how awesome it would be if Prof. Dr. Uju Anya, Ph.D. were to teach “Speaking Blackness in Brazil” on this new campus.

Bill Gates weighs in on the move…

In case any of the above tweets are memory-holed…

Full post, including comments

Nostalgia for New England: Workshop for Women, Nonbinary, and Gender-nonconforming Writers

by philg

We’re right in the middle of Hispanic Heritage Month, but this is also the time of year when I have a bit of nostalgia for New England. The early fall has a fair number of clear blue skies, the mosquitoes and other flying pests of summer are mostly gone, and the leaves are changing color. Our old house:

A few weeks ago, I was over at a friend’s house here in Jupiter, Florida. He and his family were also escapees from Lincoln, Maskachusetts. The very same day, I noticed an email from our old town’s email discussion group. It is about an online workshop that is perhaps organized by some folks farther west, but in which at least some people in Massachusetts are interested:

Writing Workshop for Women, Nonbinary, and Gender-nonconforming Writers & Aspiring Writers

.. a new online and print magazine dedicated to giving voice to women, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming storytellers in mountain literature. They are offering a thought-provoking, two-hour online writers’ workshop for women, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming outdoor writers (and aspiring writers) on September 16 at 4 p.m. Mountain Time (3 p.m. Pacific Time, and 6 p.m. East Coast Time) taught by esteemed nature writer and poet, CMarie Fuhrman. Beginners, as well as experienced authors, are welcome.

“A,” “The,” and Nothing: Articles, Attention, and the More-Than-Human World
Poet, nature writer, and part-time fire lookout CMarie Fuhrman (author of Salmon Weather: Writing from the Land of No Return, director of the Elk River Writers Workshop, and founder of the Confluence Writing Community) will lead this workshop exploring how some of the smallest words in the English language — “a,” “the,” and their absence—carry enormous weight in nature and place-based writing and social justice writing. Through close reading and writing exercises, participants will discover how article choice shapes relationships, intimacy, and the way the more-than-human world is rendered on the page. They’ll move from attention to language to craft, and leave with new tools for listening to what their writing is actually doing.

Could Graham Platner spend part of his retirement trolling for progressive females at this event? The registration page:

Desire Lines Collective is dedicated to elevating women, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming writers of mountain literature. The majority of our workshops are limited to self-identified members of these communities, including this one. We trust participants to honor this space and to uphold our value of fostering communities where women, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming people feel safe taking imaginative risks.

Confusingly, though,

We encourage applications from Black and Indigenous writers, writers of color, writers with disabilities, writers from LGBTQIA+ communities, and writers whose voices have been historically underrepresented in the outdoor publishing world.

Could a disabled Black writer who identified as a cisgender male attend?

Speaking of Hispanic Heritage Month, JetBlue got an early start on it (photo from September 8 and the holy month does not begin until September 15), which is great, but then chose to feature a film by Jared Bush and Byron Howard as part of Latinx “heritage”.

Loosely related…

Full post, including comments