Why the U.S. is out of ventilators (and why it might not matter)

In “State-by-state model of hospital bed and ICU demand” I wrote:

The biggest question mark for me is their forecast of ventilator usage (19,000 best-estimate for peak; 40,000 worst-case). If the data nerds are right, we have way more ventilators in the U.S. than we need to handle this challenge. We had at least 62,000 ventilators in service back in 2009 (source), plus another 100,000 older models in storage. Presumably a lot of the in-service ones are tied up with people who are sick with chronic conditions, but all of the older models should be available and that is a more than adequate resource. If these folks are right, everyone who is freaking out about ventilator supply is wrong.

A friend sent me a link from a critical care nurse that explains why the U.S. might well run out of ventilators. From April 1:

Yes our threshhold to intubate and ventilate is much lower than normal. We now have an abundance of patients (that turn out to be negative a day or two later) that are now on a ventilator and occupying an icu bed who would have probably been fine with a less invasive respiratory intervention.

These patients usually have a boatload of comorbidities and severe existing lung disease already so it isnt a snap to just say “oh youre negative so lets just pull the tube, send you to the floor, and youll be fine”.

Once intubated it can be a long road to extubate with these patients if we even can at all. Under normal circumstances we try everything else first with them before tubing them because we know that once tubed there will be very little chance that many will be able to be extubated without going the trach, PEG, rehab route.

This is why the rapid test will be a Godsend once widely available. We can find out who is positive and needs a tube vs just a routine COPD exacerbation that can get BiPap and not risk infecting staff. Although the sensitivity and specificity would have to be very high on the rapid test or staff would still be at risk.

If so it could free up many ICU beds that are currently being occupied by covid negative patients.

In other words, if you want a near-guarantee that no nurse or physician will get infected you have to intubate and ventilate anyone who might conceivably have COVID-19.

Some background from the same guy, March 31:

Updates at my 200 bed community hospital in NH:

Our ICU is 90% full right now. They are tubing anyone that has a high likelyhood of having the ‘rona if they go into rapid resp failure since using BiPap or Hiflo vapotherm is an exposure risk to staff and will aerosolize the virus and blow it all over the room. Out of these patients, only one has tested positive. The others have all come back negative. The positive is a vented 70+ yo lady with comorbidities who is also fighting sepsis from a bowel perforation unrelated to the virus. We have her on hydroxychloroquine and every big gun IV abx we have at our disposal including azithromycin. For the last three days she has been holding her own and her vital signs have remained stable on low-moderate pressor support.

All of our rooms have now been converted to Neg pressure rooms in the ICU as well as many rooms on the med-surg and tele floors.

As of yesterday, hospital wide, we only had 4 positive inpatients including my patient in the ICU. Only one staff member has come up positive as far as I know (our hospital is rather quiet in reporting staff positives and this info has to be come by through the grapevine). We now have to fill out a questionnaire before work attesting to no covid19 symptoms in order to get a cleared for work pass. All staff members, from contractors, to admin, to clinical must wear surgical masks at all times when in the hospital, unless treating a covid or suspected covid patient. For them, N95 or Papr must be worn with protective gown, headgear, faceshield, and double gloves.

No visitors of any kind or for any reason are allowed in the hospital and have not been for the last 2 weeks.

Its been busy, and we only have a handful of patients so far. Im looking at at least 80 hours this week. While its nice to have job security I could do without the extra dash of impending doom sitting in the pit of my stomach every day I get dressed for work.

From March 21:

In regards to the N95 shortage, I dont blame anyone with the foresight to have prepared for this fiasco and purchased them. I certainly did and had bought a several N95s in the size Ive been fitted for (along with additional food and necessity preps) once it was obvious this was more than the 2003 SARS nothingburger.

I was dumbfounded however upon learning that my hospital was completely unprepared for this 2 weeks ago when they told us they had only 40 disposable N95 masks on hand and 10 papr helmets. For the entire fu**ing hospital! There was a near mutiny in our ICU for a few days once this word got out.

I lay all the blame at the feet of our infection prevention department and their incompetent director, who amazingly still has her 6 figure salary and who seems to do little more than clog up our inboxes with reminders about handwashing and take photo-ops in front of the triage tent outside the ED.

What if God sends a ventilator and critical care team to each of the 330 million residents of the U.S. (including the 22 million undocumented, of course! According to our local church, God loves the undocumented more than anyone else.)? How much would that cut the death rate from COVID-19?

“Respiratory support for patients with COVID-19 infection” (The Lancet):

The ICU mortality rate among those who required non-invasive ventilation was 23 (79%) of 29 and among those who required invasive mechanical ventilation was 19 (86%) of 22.

Maybe 15 percent then? My physician friends say ventilation implies a 90 percent risk of death, so the ventilator will delay death and result in a 10 percent reduction in the near-term death rate. The only doc who is optimistic about the ICU and ventilators is a guy who… works in the ICU running ventilators (“critical care”). But he is unwilling to quantify the advantages conferred on patients other than to say that it may help some.

“Mortality rate of COVID-19 patients on ventilators” (Physician’s Weekly):

Probably the best published information we have so far is from the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Center (ICNARC) in the UK. Of 165 patients admitted to ICUs, 79 (48%) died. Of the 98 patients who received advanced respiratory support—defined as invasive ventilation, BPAP or CPAP via endotracheal tube, or tracheostomy, or extracorporeal respiratory support—66% died.

An article in The Guardian said this about the ICNARC study, “The high death rate raises questions about how effective critical care will be in saving the lives of people struck down by the disease.”

A medical school professor, when I asked him whether it was true that the ventilators we read about in the media every day seldom make the difference between life and death: “It’s true, but don’t let facts interfere with my panic.”

So… the epidemiologists currently trying to act as prophets are forecasting ventilator use on the assumption that only patients who need ventilators will get one. However, COVID has caused our health care system to use ventilators at a prodigious rate, just as the system is using masks and other PPE at a prodigious rate.

Related:

  • “Texas ‘mom and pop’ business flooded with orders for helmet ventilators amid coronavirus crisis” (NBC), an inexpensive device that might work better than intubation and full-scale ventilation
  • while journalists in the NYT imply that you’ll go on the ventilator, watch some cartoons, then go off and hit Starbucks and the gym, the same newspaper got a physician to write “What You Should Know Before You Need a Ventilator”: [COVID-19] causes a gummy yellow fluid, called exudate, to fill the air sacs, stopping the free flow of oxygen. If only a few air sacs are filled, the rest of the lung takes over. When more and more alveoli are filled, the lung texture changes, beginning to feel more like a marshmallow than whipped cream. … These machines can’t fix the terrible damage the virus is causing, and if the virus erupts, the lungs will get even stiffer, as hard as a stale marshmallow. … The heart begins to struggle, begins to fail. Blood pressure readings plummet, a condition called shock. For some, the kidneys fail completely, which means a dialysis machine is also needed to survive. … Eventually, all the efforts of health care workers may not be enough, and the body begins to collapse. No matter how loved, how vital or how needed a person is, even the most modern technology isn’t always enough. Death, while typically painless, is no less final. Even among the Covid-19 patients who are ventilated and then discharged from the intensive care unit, some have died within days from heart damage.
Full post, including comments

If we could build renal dialysis capacity, why not COVID-19 treatment centers?

On the one hand, the U.S. health care system is kind of lame. It consumes a ton of money. New York State spends $88 billion per year on its Department of Health, $4,400/year for every resident, mostly just for people on welfare in New York; Mexico spends about $1,100/year across all citizens, including those with jobs. The U.S. health care system delivers feeble results. Life expectancy in Mexico is 77 versus 78 in the U.S. Despite this prodigious spending, New York has completely failed to protect its residents from something that isn’t truly new.

On the other hand, the U.S. managed to build enough renal dialysis capacity to keep 468,000 Americans with failed kidneys alive. This is a complex procedure that requires expensive machines, and one that did not exist on a commercial basis until the 1960s.

Should this success story give us some hope that the U.S. will, in fact, be able to deal with the surge of demand for ventilation and life support created by the evil non-Chinese coronavirus?

Of course, one issue is that we had decades to build up all of this renal dialysis capability while we have only about one more month to build COVID-19 treatment capacity. But once we have built it, can we sail through the inevitable next wave or two of COVID-19?

Full post, including comments

What did the hand sanitizer end up being useful for?

Happy April Fools’ Day! Are the biggest fools those who frantically stocked up on hand sanitizer? What did it turn out to be useful for? Before the coronaplague hit, we had about 8 ounces left in a couple of bottles here. With five people in the household we’ve barely touched any of it. I use a touch after grocery shopping (having locked the car so that nobody comes in and steals the precious mini bottle!), but that’s a once/week activity.

What ordinary consumer has actually ended up needing a large personal supply of hand sanitizer (a.k.a. “Clear Gold”)?

Full post, including comments

Entrepreneur vs. government worker perspectives on Coronaplague

A serial entrepreneur friend forwarded an email from a local 8th grade teacher:

I have decided to take up a new hobby as a way to get outside and stay healthy and I thought why not try to run again?! I ran a half marathon 5 years ago and have tried to avoid running since because I didn’t train properly and hurt my foot. Now I know to stretch before and after so I figured now’s the time!! It’s been nice yesterday and today and I hope the nice weather continues!!

I have also been doing a lot of “virtual” time with my family and friends. It is very hard not to see anyone but this makes it feel a little easier for me. As an update, my dog no longer barks at people when we go on walks so she is getting better behaved which is also a positive!!

I miss you all very much, it makes me realize how much I love my job (which I already knew!!) and how important you are all to me. I hope you’re all taking care and finding ways to stay busy!

His commentary:

I’d love that fucking job too.

(Our teachers are still getting paid at 100 percent, but need not provide online instruction; see “The economic inequality of coronavirus”)

Full post, including comments

Let’s ask again: Number of new COVID-19 cases worldwide is declining now?

On March 26, I asked “Number of new COVID-19 cases worldwide is declining now?”

I’ve been updating that post daily with numbers from WHO and Massachusetts. Neither sequence seems consistent with frightening exponential growth (maybe the worldwide data shows an exponent larger than 1, but not all that much larger). Massachusetts does seem to be experiencing a flat-to-down trend in new cases, though without the strong upward trend in testing that I would have expected.

Maybe this is because all of the world’s governments had the foresight to put everyone into “lockdown”? (Exchanging germs only when at essential jobs, when at essential shops (such as liquor and marijuana stores), when at the laundromat, when on a Tinder date, etc.) The WHO data don’t show a dramatic difference between otherwise comparable countries that have radically different rules (Sweden has fewer cases per capita than Denmark, for example, despite Sweden being open for business while Denmark is purportedly locked down. Norway has twice as many cases per capita than Sweden, albeit fewer deaths so maybe they are just testing more of the mild cases) . More importantly, the WHO data don’t seem to show coronavirus burning exponentially through any country, regardless of what the policy might be (even Brazil, which has chosen “immunity via sewage”).

(This is not to suggest that a declining number of cases will cheer anyone up. On March 17, we were looking at the potential for 2.2 million Americans to die from coronaplague (Business Insider), based on Imperial College forecasts. Now a forecast of 100,000 to 200,000 deaths is “grim”, “stark”, and “dire” (Associated Press). Nobody will say “That’s fewer than are killed by medical errors each year and we don’t bother taking any action to reduce those.” Nobody will say “We’ve killed way more than that with taxpayer-funded Medicaid-reimbursed opioids.”)

Readers: What do you think? Given the increased testing capability that countries have been building and the numbers from the WHO, it is possible that the number of new daily coronavirus cases is actually on the decline?

Related:

Full post, including comments

Time for caravans of Americans to flee to Honduras?

How are things looking in https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports ? Should caravans of Americans be heading south? A pillar of our political faith is that everyone who lives in Honduras (139 cases), Guatemala (36 cases), or El Salvador (30 cases) needs to come to El Norte (140,640 cases) for safety (once established here, the purported “gangs” that fought each other down there will never start up another fight?).

Does coronaplague change anything? Might it be smart for Americans to flee south in caravans (“Coronavans”?) to Central America? If so, which country looks like the best option?

(Or how about Haiti? Our Deplorable President famously disparaged this fine nation of hard-working efficient well-organized citizens. But right now, with 15 cases, it looks like a safe haven, no?)

An image from Guatemala, part of my Mamiya 7 camera review:

Related:

Full post, including comments

Will convicted felons still get gold-plated health care in the plague times?

The U.S. is #1 when it comes to running prison colonies (countries ranked by incarceration rate), which just happen to be ideal environments for spreading coronavirus. Pre-plague, a convicted felon, no matter how heinous the crime, had the same right to services in the world’s most expensive health care system as anyone else. If it cost $10 million and a bunch of donated organs to keep a drug abuse-damaged murderer serving 15-20 years alive for another few years, the taxpayer was there to step up and the hospital was there to collect the revenue. If Harvey Weinstein is short of breath while serving his 23-year sentence, under the old rules he gets a ventilator with the same priority as someone who didn’t enjoy sex with a lot of aspiring actresses (and, in fact, if one of his former shower buddies or sex partners falls ill, she might have to wait in line behind her abuser to get the ventilator and ICU bed).

Now that it is obvious that the system doesn’t have enough capacity for the U.S. population, what will happen?

  • half the prisoners will get released under a “social criminal distancing” policy?
  • convicted criminals will get services with the same priority as everyone else, resulting in the deaths of Americans who haven’t been convicted of any crimes?
  • we write down a triage plan where we give an explicit priority to those convicted of crimes (but what should the priority be? Given that criminality is at least partially genetic and released criminals are likely to re-offend, does it make sense to save a 25-year-old who is in prison and from whom we expected 40 more years of crime rather than a 75-year-old in the general population from whom we expect 5 more years in a retirement home?)
  • something else?

Readers: Will this crisis break our commitment to giving convicted criminals unlimited health care?

Related:

Full post, including comments

Coronatinder

A friend visiting Hawaii found this on his phone on March 20:

Looks as though her family’s potential exposure to coronavirus is higher than might be expected by the husband/wife/whatever else she might be married to.

Time for an emergency order to shut down all dating/hookup sites? Even with “shelter in place” orders, people on their way to meet new friends can simply say “I was headed to the grocery store,” right?

[Let’s assume that the spouse is a “husband.” What if the man wants to cut his coronarisk? If he’s typically at work earning to support the family while the wife is with her new friends, suing this “mom with a chunky mom bod” will be pretty costly under Hawaii family law.]

Related:

Full post, including comments

Coronaplague cannot stop the marijuana industry

Email received by a friend who runs a retail business (or what’s left of it) from the Massachusetts Department of Revenue:

830 CMR 62C.16.2: Sales and Use Tax Returns and Payments

Status: Emergency Regulation Promulgated 3/19/2020

Tax Type: Sales (including Sales tax on meals) and Use Tax

Summary: This emergency regulation amendment adds a new section (7) which suspends return filing and payment remittance obligations for certain vendors during the COVID-19 State of Emergency declared by the Governor. Specifically, the sales and use tax filing and payment schedule for vendors, whose cumulative sales and use tax liability in the 12-month period ending February 29, 2020 is less than $150,000, shall be as follows. Returns and payments due during the period beginning March 20, 2020 and ending May 31, 2020, inclusive, shall be suspended. All such returns and payments shall be due on June 20, 2020. This suspension does not apply to marijuana retailers as defined in M.G.L. c. 94G, § 1, marketplace facilitators or vendors selling motor vehicles. Such vendors shall continue to file returns and make payments in accordance with the rules set forth in 830 CMR 62C.16.2(3)-(6).

Full post, including comments